Tuesday, July 26, 2016
New Swords & Wizardry Complete cover Revealed!
This is the cover for the upcoming printing of Swords & Wizardry Complete. Note, the transparency might not be the final version.
For comparison, here's the old cover.
I have my preference. What is yours?
(edit: I'm going to add "and why" to the above question, just cause I'd like to know ;)
Labels:
Swords and Wizardry
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Tenkar's Tavern is supported by various affiliate programs, including Amazon, RPGNow,
and Humble Bundle as well as Patreon. Your patronage is appreciated and helps keep the
lights on and the taps flowing. Your Humble Bartender, Tenkar
Blogs of Inspiration & Erudition
-
-
These Cards Are Demonic: A quick little game of diabolical summoning - My recent obsession with the new *Pokémon TCG Pocket *app has me thinking about trading card games a lot, and obviously the Pokémon game in particular. So...11 hours ago
-
This Way In - "The Sacred Well of Garlo is an intriguing archaeological site located near the village of Garlo in Pernik District, Bulgaria. Constructed between the ...12 hours ago
-
Monstrous Monday: Left Hand Path Monsters - Still at it... Layout continues on The Left Hand Path. Working on the monsters. Hope to be done here soon and get it out to you all.13 hours ago
-
[Fanzine Focus XXXVII] The Travellers’ Digest #4 - On the tail of the Old School Renaissance has come another movement—the rise of the fanzine. Although the fanzine—a nonprofessional and nonofficial public...20 hours ago
-
The return of Rock Johnson...? - Just finished up the cover for that Rock Johnson story I played around with last year. I essentially rewrote the entire story to be much much better, and ...20 hours ago
-
Blogs on Tape season 6 has begun! - Hi everybody! Its been a minute. How are you? Everything is awful all the time? Horrors never cease? You’re being driven mad by the weight of the unfathoma...1 day ago
-
Hexcrawling for Ethyria pt 2 Rumours + some campagn notes - One feature of Ethyria in the central north is the Home of the primal giant Geryon, his two-headed dogs (children of Cerabus), his ca...1 day ago
-
Sir Edgar’s Tomb - By Aaron GustwillerAaron's Gaming StuffS&Wlevels 1-2 The tomb was discovered by Aldo, a local shepherd, while he was out searching for a lost sheep. Aldo n...1 day ago
-
Star Without Number Revised Campaign - Mixing Trey Causey's Strange Stars & Terra Arisen rpg -Terrans & Reticulans - - So I've been thinking of the 'problems' of adapting the Terra Arisen campaign setting into Trey Causey's Strange Stars material. Which consists of Trey C...1 day ago
-
Felltower - Loot, Exploration, and Combat, in that order? - What is Felltower about? "Felltower is all about safety." - Ulf Well, that, and loot, exploration, and combat, in that order. The XP system rewards loot h...1 day ago
-
Some insight into FitD Action Roll difficulty - With Blades in the Dark and the other Forged in the Dark games being so much more straightforward and conventional looking than Apocalypse World, I often f...2 days ago
-
The Most Vile Spider-Man Villain Ever... - Based on the title of this post you might be expecting Green Goblin, Carnage, or even the Jackal. None of them compare to the despicable acts of the focus...2 days ago
-
dErO - VotE: Re Development - the mysterious Stephan Poag did a comic about them! The dErO Do Not Exist You do not believe in dErO. The Player Characters *cannot* believe in dErO. ...4 days ago
-
More Beautiful Development Sketches for The Great North - Tom Kilian continues to excel himself with the artwork for *The Great North*, now heading towards completion. As an Easter present, here is a work-in-pro...4 days ago
-
The grodog Thither and Hither and Points Between - While the blog and I have languished together in torpid stupor for quite some time now, the blog's silence did not originate in or from *wordslessness*, ...4 days ago
-
Tariffs, CanCon, and You - In 1972 the CBC asked listeners to complete the saying "As Canadian as...", to match "As American as apple pie." The winner was "As Canadian as possible ...5 days ago
-
Landmark Sites - Hazard - The next two landmarks will be the overtly bad ones. No positive spin on this, a Hazard is just a place you want to avoid. Unless... Well, let’s make th...6 days ago
-
Should you PAY your GM? - Let's start with the conclusion: GM-for-pay is okay. In other words: there is nothing wrong with paying someone to run a game for you, or charging people f...1 week ago
-
Noodle Bar & Industrial Scatter Terrain - This past weekend I got a couple of solid hours to paint when I wasn’t dead tired, and decided to spend it on the 3D printed Flatline City Noodle Bar tha...1 week ago
-
A Surprising Look at Murderhobos... - So I asked a question on Facebook this week. What did people do with the humanoid women and children in the Caves of Chaos, among similar adventures, persu...2 weeks ago
-
36 units sold on day one - Not big Kickstarter-type numbers or anything but still pretty personally gratifying to me, because 1) it'a more copies than the first book sold on its fi...3 weeks ago
-
Praise for Songs of the Dying Earth - Among my favourite works of fantasy fiction are the *Dying Earth* stories and the *Lyonesse *trilogy by Jack Vance. I’ve read the *Lyonesse *trilogy three ...3 weeks ago
-
Best OSR Cartographers - A video about some my favorite cartographers in the game. This is not an exhaustive list, but the ones I go to the most and ones that have influenced my st...3 weeks ago
-
Gary Con XVII - I attended Gary Con this year. Last year, I was supposed to go, but something came up and I had to cancel. This year, I ran a scenario I created called The...4 weeks ago
-
[BLOG] News on the March! Episode VI. - This post continues the series of brief play reports I have been posting on Discord. This does not cover every single session (sometimes, recon and setup...4 weeks ago
-
On the Success of the VOTE - You voted for it, and it's here! All the prices on the books I sell on DTRPG will be rising in price, 40-50% so I can maintain the same margin as now! ...4 weeks ago
-
Lexicon of Klarkash-Ton, Hierophant of Atlantis: Lupanar - This time, we follow the good High Priest to the far future, to the final continent of Earth, Zothique, for a a tale of ennui and love: Morthylla. Witho...5 weeks ago
-
Fight On! number 16 is out. - The new issue of *Fight On!* has been out for a bit. You can get copies via drivethru or lulu. I haven't finished reading my copy, but I'd like to reco...1 month ago
-
Wandering through the Majestic Fantasy Realms - It's time for another Bat in the Attic update! I am halfway through the first draft of my upcoming project, Into the Majestic Fantasy Realms, the Northe...1 month ago
-
The Hungering Dark - Go into the earth, and reality will walk alongside you. Walk further, and you will eventually be walking alone. The world is plastic down there. Tar Lat...1 month ago
-
Hobby Bingo 2025: January Progress - Welcome back to the Vault! I've painted a few bits and pieces in January and made a dent into my Hobby Bingo card! First up is a Chaplain in Terminator ...2 months ago
-
NTRPG Gaming Weekend - [image: NTRPG Gaming Weekend] This weekend was a "game day" for North Texas RPG Con, held at the same hotel the con is held at. I haven't slung dice since...2 months ago
-
The Stats of a Dave Arneson Player Character. - If you want to find the details for one of the characters that Gary Gygax made and played as a PC, perhaps to use as an NPC in your own game, it isn't t...2 months ago
-
Into the Wild Blue Yonder: A Journey Through Blackmoor's Dark Realm - *We have been thinking about you.* *We know what you want from Rob Kuntz.* You want more than another brand-new RPG module. It has to be a *First Edition ...3 months ago
-
Articulations - Creating house rules, custom rules specific to a local group or campaign, has been common throughout the history of D&D. What makes an effective house rule...3 months ago
-
A Fiftieth Anniversary Year - The 50th anniversary year of *Dungeons & Dragons *is drawing to a close. A number of projects I'd been planning for this year finally came out, and I ...3 months ago
-
A Quick Look at The Wizard’s Scroll II - October of this year saw the release of The Wizard’s Scroll II, the second issue of a White Box Fantastic Medieval Adventure Game (FMAG) zine whose first ...3 months ago
-
Writing playlists for all occasions - Hello again! Going off the idea of inspiration elaborated on by the prior post, I also have music playing while I write my various games and fiction pieces...4 months ago
-
The Tarot of Pips - Somewhere in your dice collection is a die like this one, the humblest of dice. Although you don't know it, this small white die carries with it a secr...4 months ago
-
Pirates and Necromancers, a Play Report - Over the Thanksgiving weekend we did a lot of gaming ranging from “off-table” domain level stuff to some solo adventures to spell and magic item rese...4 months ago
-
Welcome new Greyhawk Fans! - With the publication of the new Dungeon Master’s Guide, there are doubtless going to be a lot of new D&D players interested in my favorite setting, the Wor...5 months ago
-
It's been a bit - Hey everyone, I hope you are doing well! I've had a lot going on and haven't had much time to blog lately. Heres a recap of gaming events and other st...11 months ago
-
*'s in SpaaaaaAaaaace - A lot of SF (including a certain 2D6 RPG grandaddy) deal with ancient aliens taking humans from Earth and dropping them, fleas and all, on one or more w...1 year ago
-
Last move - to self-hosting! - As my vote regarding Substack in the “marketplace of ideas”, I’m moving to self-hosting. I’m now at (and hopefully staying for a long time at) Blog: ht...1 year ago
-
Osamu Tezuka (1928 - 1989) - [image: Osamu Tezuka - Shonen Magazine Cover, 1970]Shonen Magazine Cover, 1970 [image: Osamu Tezuka - Shonen Magazine Cover Illustration 1970]Shonen Maga...2 years ago
-
This is an Important Game Mechanic - *"That's the GM's Regional Map from my AOWG. And it's a damned good regional map. It's not a good map for a Simple Homebrew Campaign. It does some s$&...2 years ago
-
Clean Your Room - Looking back at my little blog here. That last post… wow, I was having fun playing WOW Classic! That was August of 1999 and I was having a blast… it was ...3 years ago
-
-
Steve Jackson Interview - James Maliszewski recently did an interview with Steve Jackson over on his Grognardia blog. Steve chats about the beginnings of The Fantasy Trip and upcomi...4 years ago
-
The Hero’s Journey 2nd Edition, Campbellian roleplaying at its best! - (this review done using the reviewers own purchased copy) I have been a James Michael Spahn fan since he wrote his Swords & Wizardry Companion. His writing...4 years ago
-
ToAD Monster of the Week: Crocoman - Now that I'm back doing the blog thing I thought I would use Tome of Adventure Design to create monsters for The Black Hack. Using the monster tables in th...5 years ago
-
More Arden Vul Art - Another great piece from Del, this one's the Forum of Set: a place that the PCs may spend quite a bit of time within.5 years ago
-
OCHRE SAND - Init +0 Ranged Atk • fire burst +3 (1d14+1, 20') AC 17 HD 3d6 MV 60 Act 1d24 SP 'breath' weapon, sideslip, perfect silence, morphing Fort +5 Ref +8 Will...5 years ago
-
Strange, Dangerous, and Inhuman: The Fey and Fairie - When I was a boy I loved fairy tales. Jack and the Beanstalk, Puss in Boots, Rumpelstiltskin - I devoured all of it. My fascination that there was a strang...5 years ago
-
New Map of the Elf Empire and Southern Isles - I’ve been having fun developing a new map-drawing style that I think is finally reaching a certain level of maturity. And yeah, it owes a lot to Matthew Ad...5 years ago
-
The Faithful - An Optional Archetype for Sharp Swords & Sinister Spells Revised Edition - Work on the revised edition of Sharp Swords & Sinister Spells is moving along. This will be a hefty tome, with a LOT of tools and new options to customiz...5 years ago
-
Dungeons & Dragonmead Fall Schedule - *As you know, I run public classic Dungeons & Dragons games at **The Loaded Die**/Metro Detroit Game Night's Board Game Nigh at **Dragonmead**, in Warren...5 years ago
-
Fiction in Airhde - On a whim this weekend, I picked up some fiction off the TLG store. *A Houseless God & Other Tales* and *The Mirrored Soul & Other Tales*, both by the T...5 years ago
-
-
Ravensburg Reboot: Streamlined City Map - I mentioned in my last post how I was tweaking and reworking parts of my Ravensburg setting. Today I streamlined the city map. The old map had lots of redu...5 years ago
-
And Now the News Draft Download on Patreon - It's self-styled Throwback Thursday and *having just released the 34-page draft booklet of Hill Cantons news to my Patreon backers* I am going to indulge m...5 years ago
-
The Withered Crag available now - I just enabled the sale of the PDF version of The Withered Crag at DriveThruRPG a few minutes ago, and the custom print version will be available startin...5 years ago
-
Annihilation Rising Goes live - The latest in Fail Squad Games’ Quick Kick projects has gone live and needs your support!! This project is only running 11 days and ends on 5/28/2019! ...5 years ago
-
James's Celebration of Life - We could not have asked for a prettier day for James's service. It was a bit chilly and windy but gorgeous. A heartfelt thank you to all that joined us tod...6 years ago
-
Trap Tuesday: A step back - I will get back to Tomb of Horrors soon. I found a topic that was interesting enough to take a break. While interacting in a 5E group on Facebook I talked ...6 years ago
-
Let's Talk About Pacing! - The idea, I think, is that the RPG is ultimately about the long game. Even rolling back to the early days of Basic & Expert, the goal of the player was...6 years ago
-
Profane and Profound Prep Part 2 - This is part 2 of my work to edit my magic items for a DMsGuild release, along with adding cursed items along the way. Here is part 1. Bone of a Saint 8000...6 years ago
-
MIDDLE DUNGEONS LEVEL FIVE 158 STAIRS. - 158 STAIRS. These stairs descend thirty feet to Area 79 on Level 6.6 years ago
-
Please, I don't do paid advertisements - don't ask. - A little note since people have asked me about this. My video channel's *not* an advertising platform, so I'm not available for hire if you want to promote...6 years ago
-
New website! - Slowly but surely, all the content here will make its way — in updated form! — to my new website: timbannock.com. For fairly obvious reasons, that site wil...6 years ago
-
Please Update Your Link! - If you're seeing this, it means your link to the Greyhawk Grognard blog is out of date. Please update your link to www.greyhawkgrognard.com (RSS feed is h...6 years ago
-
Total Sales for WB:FMAG - Hi Folks, It's been a long time since I provided an update for the sales of White Box: Fantastic Medieval Adventure Game. *LULU* Print: 396 PDF: 433 *OBS*...6 years ago
-
How can We Destroy this Campaign World? - d12 1. You must trick a bard into strumming the *Chords of Fate* on the *Lute of Annihilation* 2. Legends tell of thermonuclear weapons beneath megadunge...6 years ago
-
Mord Mar - Session 5 - We had another successful delve into the dungeon yesterday. The delvers: Moira, the Magic-User Radovan - Human Cleric (of Odin?) Khazgar Stonehand - Dwarf ...6 years ago
-
Yodeling For Yokels or The Further Misa(d&)dventures - This is the one of those posts that points out the lack of current posts. Over the last week or three, there has been postponed Labyrinth Lord (twice, one...6 years ago
-
Bundle of Fantasy Age - Bundle of Holding: Dragon Age/Fantasy Age: Available until March 12. PA Presents: Fantasy AGE Freeport live play Green Ronin in 2018 The Fantasy Age RPG ma...7 years ago
-
New Free PDF Module: The Hyqueous Vaults - A new dungeon module—written in celebration of OSRIC's 10th Birthday—by Rebecca Dettmann, Allan T. Grohe, Jr., Jimm Johnson, Matthew Riedel, Alex Zisch, a...7 years ago
-
Session XCIII: One Pissed Off Dragon! - Our ongoing Swords and Wizardry sandbox campaign... *Current Player Characters:* *Thenus* (Ranger) *Wang Du* (Monk) *Wolfheir* (Viking) *Arg* (Half-orc) ...7 years ago
-
Swords & Wizardry Light: Session # 6 - Two months after our last session (thanks to things like 8th grade finals, a 4 year-old's birthday and party, Father's Day, etc.), we finally had our next ...7 years ago
Even though I was not born when Erol Otus was making those now-legendary pieces of artwork that the old cover conjures and feel no overbearing nostalgia about his art, the new one looks more than a little disconnected from the subject matter.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, Todor. I also wasn't a gamer during the Otus golden years, but I still prefer the prior cover. The cover looks like it would be on something from a Lamentations of the Flame Princess module more than S&W.
DeleteI'm down for the original cover because of the retro-feel, and I just don't get that vibe with the new cover.
DeleteHonestly not a fan of the new cover at all.
ReplyDeleteI'm a fan of the older one. Nostalgia for Otis is part of it. Another is I helped Kickstart that one and don't really see a need for another one.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe new cover is cool...kind of a Lusus Naturae vibe - but Erol Otus is it for me.
ReplyDeleteNot a big fan of the new cover. Too new school in design. The older cover inspires taking gaming back to it's roots, this one feels too modern... like it should be a Shadowrun cover or something. I usually collect editions of certain games, but unless there are new rules being put in the upcoming edition, I'm sticking with my current copy.
ReplyDeleteThe earlier version all the way. It tells a story, invokes the imagination, makes me want to play. It draws me in. I want to explore in that world.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Dirk. It is the same feeling that the B/X covers (also illustrated by Otus) evoke.
DeleteI'm biased, of course, but I prefer the Peter Mullen cover of the S&W Core Rules edition to either the current Otus cover or the planned new cover. Personal tastes and all that.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Jon. Loved the Mullen cover the best!
DeleteI'm actually a huge fan of the Core rulebook cover as well. Otus has a distinct style but it might be a little too retro for me. Mullen feels like a middle ground between old and new, while still having a recognizable style.
DeleteAgree; I liked the Mullen cover the best (although I own the Otus hardcover). It had a great colour scheme, and fit the game's tone perfectly.
DeleteMullen's Core was my favorite, too (and I also loved White Box).
DeleteI like both of the earlier versions better than this one. The color scheme doesn't help since I tend to prefer the cooler colors like blue, black, and the tint of green. Not a fan of pinkish red or yellow on this cover or the previous one. Also, tend to want to roll my eyes when I see pink butterflies on a RPG product.
ReplyDeleteOnce you go Otus, you never go back. Well... You shouldn't, anyway.
ReplyDeleteI also think the "old cover" is cleaner/easier on the eyes.
Text on new cover is too difficult to read.
ReplyDeleteI think this new cover is totally sick! I love it!
ReplyDeleteI like both covers (do like the image on black as looking simpler and streamlined, like the S&W ruleset is), nostalgia probably puts the EO cover barely ahead for me.
ReplyDeleteThe Erol Otus cover all the way. As far why, I've always felt that Otus's artwork evokes a sense of otherworldliness that I really like. To me that's what D&D looks like, less medieval and more trippy. Probably explains why I'm such a big fan of the art of Dirk Stanley and Doug Kovacs too.
ReplyDeleteI prefer the old cover because it has a more old school feel, and I agree with Mr. Davis above that the title on the new one is a bit difficult to see, but Damn, that is a cool cover and I will likely buy one to add to my shelf.
ReplyDeleteRemove the words and I can tell what the Erol Otus cover is about. I can't say that with the new cover. It looks cool, but it tells me nothing.
ReplyDelete
Deletespot on!!
Otus > Mullen >>>>>> Whatever this is. It's not horrible; I just don't relate it to S&W. The first two covers were excellent, in my opinion. The new one doesn't connect the dots for me.
ReplyDeleteIs that a dragon/tree hybrid of some kind? As a piece of artwork I think it's fine. As the cover art for a core rpg book I think it's missing the mark. It may be cliche, but showing a bunch of heroes confronting a monster really sums up the point of D&D, whatever flavor it is. Looking at the new cover I don't know that most folks would be able to get a theme of of it. (Maybe "do not touch.") I think a cover of a core rpg book should express what the rpg is about.
ReplyDeleteMaybe it's an elder thing surrounded by a flock of mi-go? It certainly looks more "Lovecraftian" than anything remotely related to Old School D&D.
DeleteThe old cover. It tells a story like what folks said above. I really dislike thisnew cover.
ReplyDelete110% prefer the older covers by Mullen and Otus. With all due respect to the artist, the new cover is a dog's breakfast.
ReplyDeleteReally not a fan of the new cover. It doesn't evoke the (OTR, old school, retro clone, whatever you want to call it) vibe that the Erol Otus cover does.
ReplyDeleteBesides that, it tells me nothing about the game. The earlier cover: "Okay, so it's a medieval Europe type world where folks use weapons and magic to fight monsters." The new one: "So...it involves some kind of dead thing in the woods, spirit animals, and butterflies? Are the butterflies summoning the spirit thing? You play carnivorous butterflies that summon spirits?"
I'm being overly obtuse, but you get the idea. The new cover just doesn't tell me what the game will be like.
I'm all for the old covers - whether the Mullen or the Otus one. They evoke better the spirit of the game. They tell us there are heroes (I don't see any on the new cover) fighting monsters, casting spells and generally having all sorts of adventures. I also like that they are not dead serious, but evoke the sort of weird gonzo humor you can find in many older D&D modules (i.e. Castle Amber). From an illustrators point of wiew, I find the previous covers better because they are clear and legible, and - most of all the Otus one - are better designed. And yes, Tim Brannan is absolutely right - remove the lettering and you couldn't tell what game it's the cover of (or that it's a game at all, come to that).
ReplyDeleteSo please, please, please - keep the cover that Erol Otus has made. Or make him do a new one - it will certainly be better than this "grim dark moose skull with pink butterflies" affair...
Was a big fan of the original Mullen cover. The Otus one is pretty great as well. Both had a great S&W vibe. I have no idea what the heck is happening in this new cover. I've been a big fan of Matt Finch and S&W since day one but this is terrible. Why not just reprint with the same cover? It's still the same rules, right?
ReplyDeleteI like the new version. As well I like the older version. Both of which I'd wear on a T shirt. that's not the best answer is it? hmm. Well I think that at certain times things need to be updated, for the sake of argument. Sometimes its made to make something feel new again, sometimes its just because. I know from a marketing stand point (within my industry) My company has tried to keep the same theme with re-releases or re do's of graphics, because the customers know what it is when they see it.
ReplyDelete. . . I actually kind of like the new one? It's striking and, what's more, different conceptually than the S&W Core rulebook I have on my shelf. Underscores that Complete is a different animal, the same way AD&D was from B/X?
ReplyDeleteNot even sure what's being depicted on the new cover. Is it a fantasy rpg or a death metal album?
ReplyDeleteOtus for the win.
The new cover is interesting but looks like something on a new LotFP sourcebook, and does not evoke S&WC to me at all, unfortunately. I'm still in favor of the first Mullen cover but I quite like the Otus cover as well...they both display an exploration/event going on, something very "S&W"ish.
ReplyDeleteI like the older cover, not because it is particularly fantastic, but because the new one looks too generic and dark. The text is harder to find and read and I can't really tell what is going on with the cover. Some kind of plant is emitting light..... There is nothing that tells me this is a game book and not a self-published horror novel.
ReplyDeleteCan someone give me a link to where this info is coming from? I didn't realise a new version was in the works, thanks.
ReplyDeleteI like the art of the new cover, but I'm not sure it's a fit. My favourite cover ever is the idol cover of the PHB 1E, that's the style I like to go for.
the new printing is being assembled by an all ladies team and will be Kickstarted at some point in the future.
DeleteAh yes, I vaguely remember. With completely new art, correct?
DeleteThanks
DeleteI get a deep, complex, tribal vibe from the new one. It kind of reminds me of The Secret World video game. I'd expect the game behind that cover to be animistic, witchcrafty, gritty and low-tech with ritualistic magic. But my mind's eye vision of S&W and D&D is medieval and low/high fantasy with flashy magic.
ReplyDeleteI prefer the Otus myself.
The Otis cover is superior. It has great color composition and tells a story. The new cover doesn't tell me what this game is about and the color composition at the top obscures the S&W logo.
ReplyDeleteOld covers are way better than strange new one... does not feel S&W to me... more LotFP but ugly.
ReplyDeleteI don't know what the new cover is supposed to show. I see moths and the flame, and some bones. But the central image is . . . a demonic moose?
ReplyDeleteI'm not a huge fan of Erol Otus' work, but the cover shows three adventurers fighting a giant ghostly demon thing. I get it.
Plus, the yellow title and the yellow flames don't mesh well. There's not enough contrast. Coupled with the confusing image, the entire picture disrupts the visual process of drawing the eye around the picture.
The old cover has the warrior's spear and the witch's staff in parallel with the monster's spear. The glow in front of the wizard goes upward into the vapors coming off the creature (or, the wizard's spell is zapping the monster).
So, old cover wins in my book.
To continue:
DeleteExamine the cover for Pathfinder Core: a dragon, a wizard, and a warrior. Action. Something's happening. I know it's a game, and I know it's going to involve magic and dragons.
LotFP: There is an atmosphere that you know is "weird," but you need to know it's a clone to understand the weirdness. It is not a cover designed for a new gamer to understand what the game is about.
Call of Cthulhu, at least the earlier editions, required that you be somewhat familiar with Lovecraft's work to know what it was about. It could expand the gamer base if the people knew what a Cthulu was.
The first edition Player's Handbook gave players what they want: victory and loot. Notice orcs weren't used as the dead monsters. No one knew what orcs looked like, but they know what lizard-men look like.
Contrast that to the DM's Guide. Focused on the GM, it doesn't provide treasure as much as conflict (the GM runs the monsters, and there's a big red one right there on the cover!). Flipping to the back, it shows a scene of the City of Brass, suggesting that the background of the game, the setting, is the realm of the GM. While these aren't great covers, they do the job quite well.
The magenta Basic DnD set - and then the blue Expert box, that builds on the original cover by showing the wizard scrying the adventurers.
Take a look at Raging Swan's covers: Basic black, with the title. They are not designed to bring new gamers in, they are designed to support the current player base.
Plus, I had another realization about what the image looks like, and there's no way I can display that in a family-friendly environment.
Otus. Not because of nostalgia, but because it makes more sense to have a cover that communicates the idea of what the book holds within.
ReplyDeleteThis may seem like hyperbole, but if they're seriously going with this and not also offering the Otus cover as well, are using similar art inside, have not made significant changes to text/layout and (according to them) have made no changes to the rules, I've decided to grab a few extra copies of the Otus cover edition and then never buy anything to do with Complete ever again.
Actually: I said "it makes more sense". I should say: "...it only makes sense...". Only.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteErol Otus for the win.
ReplyDeleteSorry to be blunt. The artwork is proficient imo, but what the hell is it doing on the cover of S&W? Does this represent the actual game in any way? It now looks like a pretentious indie game. Awful, just awful. No adventure, no characters, no connection to D&D, fantasy, delving, fighting, monsters, nothing. Just paint a damn rose on top of a green marble shield and call it a day already... It's like S&W is now ashamed of itself and wants to look artsy, mature, grownup. Plus the old logo doesn't mesh with this thing at all. It's like trying to paste the Iron Maiden logo on top of a Cocteau Twins cover.
ReplyDeleteI meant "no connection to medieval fantasy."
DeleteI thought this was more likely supposed to be: ..for 'an' upcoming printing instead of 'the' upcoming printing. I dunno. I just read the whole situation as 'an'
ReplyDeleteMullen Art version is still available. Otus version I reckon will still be available.
I really hope that this doesn't blow up in the way of 'Who says you have a right to say what belongs on the front of S&W? Oppression from the Patriarch!' But, I'm expecting it very well might if fuel is added to a fire. After Gail and Ken ad infinitum, I really don't have the energy.
Mullen art was only on Core (and WB). Until they state otherwise, I'll assume (as they're selling copies of an actual print run instead of POD, as they honestly should) that sooner or later the Otus cover copies will run out and only this print run will remain.
DeleteAlso, to the rest...yeah. Gah.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYep, here we go.
DeleteJohn StephensYesterday 3:32 AM+1
So awesome, can't wait!
The cover art above is beautiful, but I have to say, it doesn't really say anything about S&W to me. Browsing through Kaos Nest's gallery, it's clear you found an excellent candidate for the job, and many many of KN's other pieces communicate S&W better than this one.
Gabriel Carlson
+John Stephens Dude, not cool. This is not an appropriate forum for critiquing Ms. Dellorfano's choices as developer; this is a place to leave a brief statement of excitement and support (which you did), and leave it at that.
Also, I expect that you didn't think of this because this just isn't a thing that we men have to deal with, but your choices around how, where, and when you expressed your opinion are in line with condescending, patriarchal ways of interacting with women that are problematic. I don't think that it was conscious let alone intentional; it sure as hell isn't when I do it. And, at the same time, that was the effect.
Please just be a little more conscious and considerate about the small choices you make interacting with people on the internet.
(Reposted reply with better formatting):
...discovered there's more, but I'm not going to fill up the comments section with them. I'm relieved though that other commenters over there have weighed in with some assertiveness and class.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis would be appropriate for a modern urban serial killer/detective game. It has nods to the art and iconography of the Hannibal books, movies, and series.
ReplyDeleteWhy is it on the cover of a Swords and Wizardry rulebook?
I don't know what they were thinking.
Mullen was my favorite. Otus was cool. Not into this at all.
ReplyDeleteUhm...
ReplyDeleteThe old cover has more character.
More characters actually - a wizard, a warrior, a cleric... :D
I really like it. It's different but I feel like it conveys the spooky dark qualities of many of the Lost Lands books. Honestly, I didn't like the Otus cover that much when I first saw it because I associated the Mullen core cover with the game. It grew on me. I may the weirdo since I like them all for different reasons. The Mullen cover on core is still my favorite but I can't wait to add the new one to my collection.
ReplyDeleteThe title is too hard to read.
ReplyDeleteNot really impressed with the new cover, looks like a metal album. It had the opposite effect of "growing on me" in that, I didn't mind it at first, but the more I look at the less fitting it is to me. I don't particularly care for the older blue cover image either though. Hard to please I suppose.
ReplyDeleteWell, for a product named Swords and Wizardry, the new cover seems distinctly lacking in both swords and wizards. I vote for the old one. It's more.... on point I believe.
ReplyDeleteOverall, think I like the colour palette of the old cover better; and I like the fact that the old cover has an encounter scene with clearly distinguishable elements. The World Otis vibe doesn't hurt either.
ReplyDeleteThe new cover looks interesting. I don't know if it would be more effective if I could more easily distinguish the elements comprising the picture. How finished - apart from the title transparency - is the final image? If it's more of a mock-up that would make a difference, and seeing the ultimate final cover might make a difference.
Uhm, Erol Otus. Thanks, Autocorrect.
DeleteI like the new one. I get the old one, but the new one intrigues and excites me on multiple levels.
ReplyDeleteThe new cover in no way conveys what the game is or what it is about. I'll fully admit that me preference for the Otus cover comes from nostalgia, but it also performs the function of setting the actual mood and tone for the game, where this new one is just.. confusing.
ReplyDeleteWhile I like the art for the new cover, I don't think it works well for S&W. It just doesn't generate an emotional response in me indicative of OSR. Or, basically, it would work for something else much better.
ReplyDeleteI'm not a fan of this cover, I much prefer the Mullen and Otus covers. I don't think the new one evokes the game very well. The art makes me think the game's title should be Fantasy: The Conjuring not Swords & Wizardry. Just my two coppers.
ReplyDeleteGood call! Maybe change the name to Swords: The Wizardrying and type the name in small minimalist white fonts... ;)
DeleteI'm in the minority it seems but I much much prefer the new one. Far more intriguing.
ReplyDeleteFrankly, I like the Otus cover. I think it screams "Old School" and elicits a nostalgic feeling for the old days. That being said, are the publishers trying to reach a new audience? If so, that new cover might help.
ReplyDeleteIn the long run, it's what's between the book's covers that really matters.
This isn't the cover I would have chosen, but I do like it.
ReplyDeleteI have to throw my vote to the EO cover as well. The new version doesn't tell you what's inside.
ReplyDeleteI have to throw my vote to the EO cover as well. The new version doesn't tell you what's inside.
ReplyDeleteI love everything about the new cover, except the fact that it does not invoke "swords and wizardy". If that was a game about chaotic magic, it would be my immediate choice. But as for Swords & Wizardy, I prefer the old picture - because that has a connection to what the game is about, because that shows you what you will find inside with a single image.
ReplyDeleteI respect the artist & publisher for trying something new in a hobby that, for both better and worse, sometimes struggles to reach beyond its own nostalgia.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, I *don't* think the new art is a good fit for S&W given that it doesn't reflect the primary themes, action, or characters of the game. My honest first thought was, "Shoot, I should really go buy a copy or two of the Mullen cover before those become hard to find." I love Otus more than I can rationally account for, but the Mullen cover does even a better job of evoking the *feel* of my game at the table.
I think the new art would be a great fit for a ritual magic supplement that outlined a couple hundred new spells, sanity & side effects rules, a few new classes, etc.
I like the new cover, and the discussion and opinion it creates, because it is different, somewhat challenging, and reaches out to a new audience; S&W, and the rest of the DIY DnD exemplars, are easily robust enough now to start appealing to and reaching out towards new tastes, new creative talent, and new audiences. The plain fact of the matter is if you liked the old cover you probably already own it (or easily could), and if this new cover causes new people to pick up the rules and play the game, then really that's the best thing that can happen for the game (and associated games) anyway.
ReplyDeleteI showed this cover and all of the older covers of all of the S&W flavors to quite a number of gals (girlfriend, daughter, daughter's friends, my friends, my girlfriend's friends). Guess what? Not only did they ALL dislike the cover, they strongly preferred each and every one of the other covers far and away more so than the new. These are not gamer gals. They are mostly geeks of one stripe or another. Some in their 30s, 20s, teens, and a handful of 9-10 year olds. Sounds like a new audience, huh? Now, what if they liked it and didn't know what was in it/what it was about? Drawn in by the new cover only to discover it's some fantasy action rpg. They might even feel as though it's a 'bait and switch'. Not exactly a winning plan.
DeleteI'm not into it, personally. I'll give the game the benefit of the doubt and say that maybe they're trying to take it in a much different direction. However, even giving it that, I'm not really sure what I'm looking at. (Whatever it is, though, it looks more like it belongs on the cover of a melodic death metal album rather than an RPG.)
ReplyDeleteThe previous cover was great at immediately telegraphing its intentions. One look at that Erol Otus cover (or even the Core cover by Peter Mullen) and you know EXACTLY what Swords & Wizardry is about and what it's trying to accomplish.
It's definitely a different feel. I like the metal vibe from it. Copies with the Otus cover continue to be available; we still have plenty of them left.
ReplyDeleteWow.I dont own S&W and this is the first look for me at the Otus cover, it is phenomenal and right on with OS gaming! The newer image is also awesome but has some ambiguity that makes it look like an album cover for a killer band!
ReplyDeleteWow.I dont own S&W and this is the first look for me at the Otus cover, it is phenomenal and right on with OS gaming! The newer image is also awesome but has some ambiguity that makes it look like an album cover for a killer band!
ReplyDeleteWhat is that a picture of? A tree? Honestly can't tell.
ReplyDeleteIs this supposed to be that re-vamped S&W done by a bunch of women?
ReplyDeleteIt looks like a dream journal a 14 year old girl (or boy these days) bought in Barnes and Noble!
Not just no, hell no!
I like the blue cover. The new one, eh . . . not so much. It seems like an album cover or a book cover. It doesn't feel like a game book cover that tells me anything about what's inside.
ReplyDeleteSetting aside that the older one is Erol Otis...
ReplyDeleteThe new cover communicates nothing about "adventure". It looks more like a gothic horror thing... Not even sure what it's supposed to be.
Some kind of animated Deer-skull thing with thorn antlers? What does it have to do with Swording and Wizarding?
Look back at B/X covers... Look at old AD&D covers... Most communicate a group of stalwart adventurers going up against something.
Man vs. Nature, as it were... PCs vs. Monster. Heroes vs. Villains.
The new cover does nothing to communicate what the game is about.
I prefer the older, more traditional cover over the glossy, newer cover. Though I do tend to prefer my games "grittier", I like the action on the older cover, where characters in peril are actually *doing* something. I think this speaks to player agency, which is critical. The newer cover shows . . . something . . . sorta . . . doing . . . something. I think.
ReplyDeleteThe new cover appears to be the spirit of a deer rising from its bones with fireflies or moths around it. It evokes animism, Shinto (ever seen Princess Mononoke?), magic, and rebirth. Great stuff but as I said more like the cover art of a concept album. It is good art though.
ReplyDeleteThe new cover appears to be the spirit of a deer rising from its bones with fireflies or moths around it. It evokes animism, Shinto (ever seen Princess Mononoke?), magic, and rebirth. Great stuff but as I said more like the cover art of a concept album. It is good art though.
ReplyDeletePurely a personal preference, of course, but I think the new one is ugly in terms of it colors and the combinations of colors. The art has a dark, muddy, and/or indistinct quality that I don't care for. The title's lettering style doesn't seem like a good fit for the new art either. Like many others, I'm also not sure what the new art is depicting. So I prefer the Otis one sort of by default. I'm open to new cover art; I like the color scheme of the Otis cover a lot, but I'm not a big fan of his art in general. Still, Otis's cover has a lot more going for it than the new one.
ReplyDeleteI really dislike this cover. I love S&W, but this cover just feels wrong. In order of preference (for the cover), I like Core (Mullen), Whitebox (Mullen), Complete (Otis).
ReplyDelete